Quantum Biology Research Labs

PO Box 157

Northport, NY 11768

Quantum fields can now be generated from specially designed machines, as well as from the human body. Scientific studies on quantum fields generated from machines have been conducted in the fields of physics, non-linear optics and free energy. Relatively few studies, however, have examined the ability of inert carriers to store quantum fields in a form available for subsequent use. Nonetheless, the long-term storage of information has been scientifically established, despite the lack of understanding about the mechanisms involved.
 

The fact that water can act as such a carrier of quantum energy has been well documented in the field of homeopathy. This phenomenon, referred to as water memory, mostly studied in terms of classical electromagnetic fields (Fesenko, 1995), but has also been studied by frontier scientists using quantum fields (Rein, 1992, Schwartz, 1991, Dibble & Tiller, 1999). Thus, water appears to store both chemical (homeopathic), EM and quantum information. In addition to water, geometric patterns (Rein, 1997), electronic circuits (Dibble & Tiller, 1999) and even paper (Omura, 1990) can store the subtle energies of quantum fields. These substances can therefore act as a continued source of quantum fields, even after the original energy which activated them has been removed.
 

The Quantum Biology Research Lab has been studying the biological effects of quantum fields since its conception in 1990. Of the different biological systems investigated it was discovered that the DNA molecule is a particularly effective antennae for quantum fields. Thus, in addition to classical EM fields (Semin, 1995), quantum fields resonates with the DNA molecule and causes a conformational change (winding and unwinding) of the two strands which make up the helix (secondary structure of DNA) (Rein, 1994a, 1995, 1996). This assay has been used to study EM emission from the body (Rein, 1994a, 1995, 1996), water memory (Rein, 1994b) and free energy devices (Rein, 1998).
 

Dimensional Designs has developed a process for storing different types of quantum fields in a variety of inert carriers. These experiments were designed to scientifically test the efficacy of the safespace™ which has been imprinted with frequencies believed to neutralize the harmful biological effects of EM fields generated from cell phones.
 

In these experiments the biological system being influenced by the EM fields from cell phones is purified human DNA suspended in water. The experimental methodology used in these experiments involves measuring the re-winding of the two DNA strands back into an intact double helix. Such conformational changes of DNA are classically measured by monitoring the absorption of UV light as a function of time (Thomas, 1954). The more unwound the DNA, the more exposed it is and the more it absorbs light.
 

Three types of experiments were conducted in this study. The control experiments were done first in the presence of ambient EM fields, but in the absence of any man-made EM fields. In the electromagnetic experiments, DNA re-winding was measured in the presence of EM fields from cell phones. The third set of experiments involved measuring DNA re-winding in the presence of neutralized EM fields from cell phones containing the safespace™ product.
 

The specific protocol that was followed involved diluting denatured (unwound) human placental DNA (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis) in de-ionized water to a final concentration of 0.03mg/ml. The DNA was gently transferred to a quartz cuvette and then placed in the cuvette holder inside the spectrophotometer. For EM field exposure a mobile Nokia cell phone (plugged in and set on standby mode) was placed face up on top of the cuvette. To neutralize the EM fields, the CLEARLINE PROTECTOR™ was placed on the back of the cell phone directly below the antennae with its central line running parallel to the main axis of the cell phone. A systematic examination of different locations and orientations was not done in this study, but could be considered for future studies. For both types of EM field treatments, the EM environment around the cuvette holder needed to be conditioned. This was accomplished by pre-conditioning the environment for 6 hours prior to adding the DNA to the cuvette holder.
 

In order to measure an effect of these EM fields on DNA, the resonant conditions needed to be established. Under resonant conditions an information transfer will occur resulting in a physical change in the DNA molecule. It was expected that EM fields would slow down the natural rewinding process. Several trial experiments were conducted with this system until the resonant conditions were established. As expected the critical experimental conditions required to see an effect of cell phones on DNA included exposure time, intensity of the EM fields and the orientation

of the DNA samples relative to the EM field.
 

In addition, it was discovered that an unexpected set of conditions was required to observe an effect of the cell phone energy on DNA. The specific conditions required for such coupling depended on the nature of the energies involved. In this case, EM fields from the motor in the spectrophotometer, the cell phone and the ambient environment all interact. Due to this complex mixture of energies, a 6 hour accumulation and equilibration time was required before the DNA sample was introduced into the pre-conditioned environment. Another recent study also observed an environmental conditioning effect (Dibble and Tiller,1999), although biological systems were not utilized.
 

The results in Figure 1 and Table 1 demonstrate the effect of electromagnetic (EM) fields from cell phones on DNA re-winding. Each graph in Figure 1 represents the re-winding curve from one typical experiment. In the absence of EM fields a negative slope for DNA re-winding was obtained (top of Figure 1). This is to be expected since the absorption of light decreases when the DNA rewinds over time. A more negative value for the slope reflects a steeper slope and a more rapid rewinding. In the absence of EM fields the average slope (re-winding) was -0.765 ± 0.05. In the presence of the cell phone energy, the slope becomes positive with an average value of +0.806 ± 0.08. This indicates that the EM field from the cell phone is so toxic that it entirely prevents the DNA from naturally re-winding and causes it to unwind even more. The detrimental effect of EM fields from the cell phone is highly significant compared to the untreated control (p<0.0001).
 

Since cell phones are known to emit several types of EM fields with frequencies including the ELF, microwave and radiowave regions of the EM spectrum, the question arises as to which of these fields are blocked by the safespace™ technology. A definitive answer cannot be made since the source of radiation in this study was an actual cell phone. However examination of the literature (Goodman, 1989; Lai, 1995,1996; Brusick, 1998; Krewski, 2001) indicates that all three types of EM fields generated from cell phones have direct effects on mammalian DNA. Although the particular activities of DNA measured in these studies are not the same as that measured in the present study, the results from the literature indicate that all three types of EM fields can resonate with DNA. Therefore, it can be concluded that either and all of these different EM fields emitted by cell phones are likely to be blocked by the safespace™ technology.

References